Adolescent to Parent Face Negotiation Regarding Depression

I. Rationale: In this section, let the reader know why you have chosen this area of study and why it is an important area for interpersonal communication scholars to study. Give the reader an idea of your general purpose. Develop a warrant (or argument) for studying what you chose.

Advance some hypotheses or pose a research question(s) which your scholarly review of literature will ultimately justify testing. End this section with your Research Question(s). 

II. Database & Key Words: Describe online databases you used to conduct your library research (i.e. discuss all on-line indexes searched and be specific, e.g., Communication Source, Psych Lit, etc.) and what key words you used. You may use scholarly journals, books, and book chapters, or internet-based sources for which you can demonstrate scholarly credibility.

III. Bibliography: Present a minimum of 20-25 relevant sources (articles, books, book chapters from anthologies). This bibliography list constitutes an argument that you did a thorough search and are presenting the most important, relevant, and central sources available out there. 

At least half of your sources must be data-based research reports. Focus your sources in communication as much as possible. References must be presented in correct APA 6th edition style with DOI number.

IV. Outline. Present a detailed outline of the major headings and topics that will appear in your Paper #2. 

V. Sample literature review pages. From the draft outline of your paper, turn in 2-3 pages of your written-up literature review prose; probably it will cover one of the topic areas. Start with a subheading. Within these pages be sure you are synthesizing (drawing together) the ideas from at least six sources. Treat them as a group of information rather than separate articles. 

Argue (for or against) UNCITRAL Model Law effectiveness in Cross Border Corporate Insolvency

Notes:

• You must demonstrate understanding of Australia Corporations Act s 581 and s 583, and draw comparison with UK s426 and US broad discretion.
• You must demonstrate high level understanding of Chapter 5 of Australia’s Cross-Border Insolvency Act (not 5.2, 5.4A) and s 601CL of the Corporations Act.
• You must incorporate these cases into your essay Alari [2018] FCA 1067, Edelsten [2016] FCA 1269, Zetta Jet [2018] FCAFC 132, Suk [2016] FCA 1404.
• You must demonstrate understanding of Part 4 of UNCITRAL Cross Border Insolvency Model Laws 2014. 
• You must demonstrate comprehension of recent and pending reforms in this area in the jurisdictions you chose, e.g. US (2018), Europe (2017 regulations), Singapore (17/18 reform) etc.
• You must use authoritative report when referencing cases. Mark will be deducted for each reference contradicting AGLC. Foreign laws and precedents must be in the correct AGLC reference.
Hint: 
• you start with by researching how US Chapter 11 (or other jurisdictions of your choice) differs from Australian corporate insolvency legislation, look at cases where Australian companies accessed US courts to protect assets from quick sale liquidation. What about Australian creditors seeking recovery in other jurisdictions? Which jurisdiction seeks to be “treaty-shoppers paradise”, and which jurisdiction seeks maximum protection for special classes of local creditors (e.g. employees and tax office priority as unsecured creditor), which jurisdiction seeks to encourage entrepreneurship and risk-taking. Chart UNCITRAL model law enactment against this spectrum. 
• Consider your argument on effectiveness – effective against what standard/measurement?
• Your argument may parallel the territorialism vs universalism vs modified universalism debate, but no mark is allocated for historical or theoretical research, mark is only given for arguments backed by cases.
• Remember if you deem the UNCITRAL model law not effective, you must give case evidence to show why European regulation on cross-border insolvency is more effective, theoretical and hypothetical discussions do not strengthen your argument.

REIT REPORT

This is an individual assignment which will require you to prepare a detailed property report

on a selected Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT).

Assignment Overview

This assignment requires you to analyse information on a selected REIT. You will need to

provide the following details on trust properties: location, types of properties, and

information about the trust: size and debt level. Alongside performance data, this

information forms the basis for decision making by REIT investors. Financial and market

data used must be as at 30th June 2018.

Assignment Objectives

On completion of this assignment you will be able to:

1) Source information on a key Australian property sector.

2) Identify and describe the key components of an Australian REIT.

3) Detail the composition of a selected REIT. Highlighting key features and strategies

of the REIT, which will assist an investor to make a decision on it.

4) Prepare and deliver a quality property research report. 

Should directors’ duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth.) only be directed to the interests of the corporation and its shareholders, or include the interests of employees, the environment and the community?

You are expected to research a specified topic reading and interpreting cases, journal articles and law reform policy reports. You are also expected to analyse the effect and operations of these laws and policies on companies and their stakeholders and you are expected to report on corporate legal issues using a Report format.

In your answer, you must refer to Australian case law and sections of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth.) and other relevant legislation.

This assignment is to Critique of a research article for Mental Health Nursing student

A critique of a research article that must include an annotated critiquing framework, that is relevant to base your practice on (2500 words; written in 3rd person).

Practicum-Assessing Clients

Assess clients presenting for psychotherapy

Develop genograms for clients presenting for psychotherapy
To prepare:

Select a client whom you have observed or counseled at your practicum site.
Review pages 137–142 of the Wheeler text and the Hernandez Family Genogram video in this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on elements of writing a Comprehensive Client Assessment and creating a genogram for the client you selected.
The Assignment
Part 1: Comprehensive Client Family Assessment

With this client in mind, address the following in a Comprehensive ClientAssessment (without violating HIPAA regulations):

Demographic information
Presenting problem
History or present illness
Past psychiatric history
Medical history
Substance use history
Developmental history
Family psychiatric history
Psychosocial history
History of abuse/trauma
Review of systems
Physical assessment
Mental status exam
Differential diagnosis
Case formulation
Treatment plan
Part 2: Family Genogram

Prepare a genogram for the client you selected. The genogram should extend back by at least three generations (great grandparents, grandparents, and parents).

Required Readings
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Chapter 5, “Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy” (pp. 225–238 and pp. 245–258)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.



Young, J. M., & Solomon, M. J. (2009). How to critically appraise an article. Nature Clinical Practice. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 6(2), 82–91.



How to Critically Appraise an Article by Young, J.; Solomon, M., in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vol. 6/Issue 2. Copyright 2009 by Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission of Nature Publishing Group via the Copyright Clearance Center. 

Select one of the following articles on psychodynamic therapy to evaluate in your Assignment:

Aznar-Martinez, B., Perez-Testor, C., Davins, M., & Aramburu, I. (2016). Couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy as the treatment of choice: Indications, challenges, and benefits. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(1), 1–20. doi:10.1037/a0038503

Karbelnig, A. M. (2016). “The analyst is present”: Viewing the psychoanalytic process as performance art. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(supplement 1), S153–S172. doi:10.1037/a0037332

LaMothe, R. (2015). A future project of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Revisiting the debate between classical/commitment and analytic therapies. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(2), 334–351. doi:10.1037/a0035982

Migone, P. (2013). Psychoanalysis on the Internet: A discussion of its theoretical implications for both online and offline therapeutic technique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 281–299. doi:10.1037/a0031507

Tummala-Narra, P. (2013). Psychoanalytic applications in a diverse society. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(3), 471–487. doi:10.1037/a0031375

Statistical Analysis Report

V. Recommend operational improvements to stakeholders:

A. Summarize your analysis plan for both internal and external stakeholders. Be sure to use audience-appropriate jargon when summarizing for both groups of stakeholders.
B. Explain how your decision addresses the given problem and how you reached that decision. Be sure to use audience-appropriate jargon for both groups of stakeholders.
C. Justify why your decision is the best option for addressing the given problem to both internal and external stakeholders and how it will result in operational improvement. Be sure to use audience-appropriate jargon when communicating with stakeholders.