This is Executive Summary of Leadership of General Erich Ludendorff. Using the command and leadership content, as well as current experience in military organizations. Focus; The assignment also includes a brief background of Ludendorff and his operating environment is a necessary component of this assignment, the writer should focus the bulk of the Executive summary on the Ludendorff analysis – his strengths, limitations and relevance to Command and Leadership. As much as is practical, use reputable scholarly sources (eg academic books and journals) to support your argument. And focus your analysis on key leadership elements at the highest applicable levels.Ludendorff .

include a brief background of Ludendorff and his operating environment is a necessary component of this assignment, the writer should focus the bulk of the Executive summary on the analysis of Ludendorff – his strengths, limitations and relevance to Command and Leadership. As much as is practical, utilise reputable scholarly sources (e.g. academic books and journals) to support your argument.

This assignment is Executive Summary or Written Brief for oral presentation and has 3 patrs (Intro, body and conclusion) – Endnotes are written in Chicago Manual of Style 16th ed. (Full note, no Ibid)patrs (Intro, body and conclusion) – Endnotes are written in Chicago Manual of Style 16th ed.( full note , no Ibid)

1.Cite and briefly describe the roles of the three primary sources of power in modern U.S. hospitals. Which do you feel has the greatest amount of power? Support your decision with examples and primary sources.

2.What trends are we seeing in the most common forms of physician medical practices (clinics) and other ambulatory care at this time? Describe the changing forms of physician practice and ambulatory care in the U.S. as a result of managed care. Support your answer.

3.What is a benchmark? How are they used in health care? How may they help us improve the quality of care, access, and allocate funding? Give an example of a:
• Clinical benchmark
• Financial benchmark 
• Operational benchmark

Write a 750-1,000-word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that should be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper: 

1.A description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues 

2. Implications of each ethical issue 

3.Ways to avoid the ethical issues in psychological assessments 

4.A discussion of how to clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures 

5.A discussion of how a client's academic / educational, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice Include a discussion of how these ethical issues are addressed in "Section E: Evaluation, Assessment, and Interpretation" from the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics located at: http://www.counseling.org/Resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf.  

Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the textbook in your paper.  Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. This assignment will  be submitted to  Turnitin.

150-200 word discussion for each question  please answer the following :

1. What would you do if you were providing a psychological test to a counseling client and an issue arose in which your personal ethics were in conflict with the established state and/or federal laws and/or codes of ethics? Provide an example to support your response.

2. What serious ethical violation could occur if a counselor administered a psychological test incorrectly or without considering multicultural factors? Identify the ACA Code of Ethics statements that apply in this scenario.

1.Why is using the correct research writing style so important? In APA style, search on Google for each of the following and provide the appropriate citation for:

a)     A book;

b)     A journal article; and

c)     A movie 

2.Why is it important to test hypotheses? 

3.How would you test your hypothesis?  

4. What is research proposal?                                                                                                 

 5.Descriptive and inferential statistics?

This week we will take an in-depth look at the organization known as the World Trade Organization (WTO). 

Begin by exploring the WTO website, which gives you a comprehensive overview of the WTO. Then chose one of the various topics covered by the WTO, such as anti-dumping, TRIPS, etc. any topic of interest to you and give the class a mini presentation of the topic and include a real life example of that topic. This should be 3-4 paragraphs. 

 For your follow-up response, question or comment on one of your classmates’ topics. 

Overview of the WTO

·          

·         Check Work for grammer and spelling

·         One Page Minimum

·          Cite work with sources – APA 6th

·         Post on Separate word Docs for Financial Accounting and International Business

Complete the readings, then reflect critically on How Google Works in the light of the other readings. What are some key elements of Google’s culture, and how do they relate to elements of culture mentioned in “How Innovative is Your Company’s Culture?” and “GE and the Culture of Analytics”? What about Google’s culture might translate well to other environments, and what would be challenging? Would it be a good idea for all companies to have a culture like Google’s? Consider which elements of the Google culture could be relevant to your small group assignment.

In this discussion, I will be looking for evidence that you are able to relate the elements of culture discussed in the readings and begin forming your own framework of the key elements of organizational culture. 

essay around 400 words

Three different tests have been devised to establish if there is a duty of care, has it been breached and was it foreseeable. With the first being the Neighbour test this was the first and was introduced by Lord Atkins, the other tests were derived from this test. Lord Atkins established e-lawresources (n,d) ‘you are to love your neighbour’ ‘take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee’. He then went on to explain that your Neighbour e-lawresources (n,d) is ‘persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act’.

Because the Neighbour test was too broad the Anns test was established by Lord Wilberforce, but just for manufacturing. His test included two stages: e-lawresources (n,d)

’ 1. Examine whether the loss was reasonably foreseeable and there existed a relationship of proximity. If so a prima facie duty of care arises.

2. The defendant may put forward policy considerations to negate liability.’

However, they still thought this was too broad and so the Caparo test was brought in. Under this test it has to be established; e-lawresources (n,d)

‘1. That harm was reasonably foreseeable

2. That there was a relationship of proximity

3. That it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care’

All of these tests have shown that it has to be foreseeable, there must be a proximity and it must be fair to expect a duty of care.

An example of this would be the major crash on M5 in 2011. In which 34 cars were involved in a crash caused by a mixture of fog and smoke, which killed 7 and injured 51. A car crash in these circumstances is foreseeable however, having a firework display close to the road and adding to the fog was not.

Please have your views or opinion put forth regarding what extent does damage caused by a breach of duty have to be foreseeable?

An employment contract can not cover all aspects of the employer, employee relationship (Truss, et al., 2012). It can only specify what tasks are required by the employee and for what reimbursement. An employee handbook lays out a set of principles that are expected of an employee and in turn address the type of corporate environment it is attempting to create.

Contractual Rights, as an employee are different from Statutory Rights, and again are diverse from whether an employee is committed or engaged to an organisation. (Beardwell & Claydon, 2010) highlight Lagge’s (2005: 105-06) unitary theory that “communication, motivation and leadership” are crucial factors in generating commitment from employees. One of the key elements to HRM and SHRM is employee buy-in, it is not enough for an individual to be competent at their job, they must also contribute to the overall strategic goal. Dynamic, innovative etc. The employer, offers the employee the platform to accomplish this. I believe that is (as least one, if not a foundational piece of) the “cost” of an employee employer relationship.

HRM may set the parameters of how an organisation recruits, retains and develops resources, but it must be in collaboration with Line managers. HRM do not manage other departments (they may steer them, but that is the breadth of their influence).

Would you agree or disagree that it is the corporate culture that dictates the style of Line management, encouraged by a reactive (instead of proactive) HRM, with poor resource planning and engagement approaches?

Three different tests have been devised to establish if there is a duty of care, has it been breached and was it foreseeable. With the first being the Neighbour test this was the first and was introduced by Lord Atkins, the other tests were derived from this test. Lord Atkins established e-lawresources (n,d) ‘you are to love your neighbour’ ‘take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee’. He then went on to explain that your Neighbour e-lawresources (n,d) is ‘persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act’.

Because the Neighbour test was too broad the Anns test was established by Lord Wilberforce, but just for manufacturing. His test included two stages: e-lawresources (n,d)

’ 1. Examine whether the loss was reasonably foreseeable and there existed a relationship of proximity. If so a prima facie duty of care arises.

2. The defendant may put forward policy considerations to negate liability.’

However, they still thought this was too broad and so the Caparo test was brought in. Under this test it has to be established; e-lawresources (n,d)

‘1. That harm was reasonably foreseeable

2. That there was a relationship of proximity

3. That it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care’

All of these tests have shown that it has to be foreseeable, there must be a proximity and it must be fair to expect a duty of care.

An example of this would be the major crash on M5 in 2011. In which 34 cars were involved in a crash caused by a mixture of fog and smoke, which killed 7 and injured 51. A car crash in these circumstances is foreseeable however, having a firework display close to the road and adding to the fog was not.

Please have your views or opinion put forth regarding what extent does damage caused by a breach of duty have to be foreseeable?